"The 2003 Hawaii International Conference on Social Sciences. The Second Annual Conference. June 12 - 15, 2003. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

 

 

 

Citizens role in participating monitoring of urban areas

 

 

G. Anselmi, ENEA – U. Mocci, expert ICT

 

 

Introduction

Many reasons  push to re-examinate the citizens role in today life of the big towns and specifically in environmental  monitoring. In one hand, the complex and often contradictory nature of the urban problems (e.g. cities enlargement and  multiethnic migration and urbanization phenomena) are creating new needs; at the other hand, the change of behaviours are producing a weakening of the social cohesion and of the natural identification of citizens with their historic traditions. In addition, the new achievements of IC tecnologies, have determined the spread out of internet and intranet data networks and  of both fixed and mobile terminals with internet navigation  capability. Such infrastructures can be used easily to collect data about the status of the towns, possibly by using specific applications and formats accessible on the network. A further element is represented by the administrative constraints and the need to limit the public services costs and improve their efficiency. All these factors motivate a strong action to be undertaken by the Local Authorities with the manifold objective to involve  citizens in finding shared solutions to the main problems of the towns and in contributing to the environmental monitoring.

Hereinafter these mentioned problems will be examined especially in relation to the second aspect, the role that citizens can play in the urban monitoring and in quality control of public services. In this respect the services delivery conditions will be analysed from a systemic point of view; the new chances offered by ICTs to make easier town monitoring will be further examined  to point out the benefits expected on both techno-economical and social side.

 

Urban systems, environmental and public services quality

Environmental and Services Quality  (ESQ) plays a very important role in the advanced societies, as it deeply influences goods and services production, constitutes an element of guaranty and safety in social behaviours and market relationships and really defines an important framework qualifying the life conditions of the towns.

ESQ involves the behaviours of distinct actors (Government Institutions, Public Services Enterprises, Local Control Authorities, Citizens and their Associations) in the frame of established rules. Such a system presents a complex frame of interactions (see Fig.1), in which great relevance is taken not only by the quantity of investments and the efficiency of the involved operational structures, but also by the social behaviours (public participation and behaviour, attention given to the citizens, open-minded of the Institutions).

The today management of environmental and Public Services processes can be represented as in Fig.2, where controls on the population and on the environment are exerted under a given set of rules mostly without any intervention of the citizens, which are only authorised  to give long term feedback with the choice of the local government.

In the frame of  participating towns the role of the citizens is much wider and relevant to a  number of directions, as represented in Fig.3. We can distinguish in particular.

-       transversal links directed toward the others citizens;

-       monitoring actions, which integrate or substitute the ordinaries ways of monitoring;

-       a more external feedback, relevant to the identification of the town problems and of  the relative solutions.

As to the impact on the services delivery processes, it is wise to distinguish two reference management schemes, respectively based either on pre-established programmed interventions, or on dynamic programs adapted according to the real status of the town. The first scheme is characterised by a limited effort in real time town monitoring and the interventions are mostly made according to a fixed program updated on a mid-long term time scale. The second case is characterised by more focused and efficient interventions, that follow the indications risen by a larger monitoring activity; the last could be done at very marginal costs resorting to the modern IC technologies and  to citizen participation.

 

New Technologies and urban monitoring

The monitoring of the towns can be carried out with different features and timescales. Data collected by the monitoring process can be utilized off-line, to identify new needs of  services and re-organise services delivering, or on-line, in the frame of adaptive delivering processes. In both  cases, however, monitoring data must be processed to find out statistics, to evaluate  demand to satisfy, to verify  quality and  efficiency of  services and, in the case of adaptive delivering, to adequate delivering plans to the services needs. So it is always necessary to collect data by monitoring and to store data in a city database for further processing. The whole chain can be very expensive to implement and  manage, taking into account the territory extension of the big cities. Till some time ago the technologies usable to collect data where very expensive and could not be easily deployed ; however in the recent time, new and encouraging chances have been emerged regarding to the all rings of the process chain, i. e. the collecting networks, the terminal equipments, the storage and processing of data.

As to the network, the Internet network, can cover metropolitan areas at very low cost, being accessible both from all the telephone sets of the fixed network and all the terminals of mobile and wireless nets. Messages (e-mail, fixes images, forms) can be sent via Internet or Intranet at very cheap marginal costs, once the application necessary to access and communicate with the internet collecting sites would be installed in the net servers. Also the development of such applications and the management of the collecting internet site, are not particularly expensive, being the costs of the data collection due essentially to the costs of the operators involved in monitoring. This cost item can be easily put down, or highly reduced, resorting to citizens’ participation.

Also as to the data-entry (putting data in the database), that traditionally has constituted a big barrier to the realisation of efficient monitoring systems, the technological developments have now radically changed the situation. In this regard it is necessary to consider that the most of the events of the towns to be monitored have attributes that can be  defined a priori and included  in dynamic forms, accessible at the internet data collection site, that can be filled in by the citizens during the sent of their messages. With this technology forms are directed back to the sites and stored in the database without intervention of operators. All these applications are weakly service-sensitive, so it is possible to think to a unique collecting structure for several services or to a dedicated structure for each service, simply developed one from the other.

In conclusion today technological evolution makes  possible easily:

- to realize effective  Urban Sensorial Systems (SSU), union of the telecommunication nets and of human collectors (citizens/operators) sending their proposals or complaints through fix and mobile terminals

- to realize urban integrated systems, by which to control  the Environment and Services Quality, that are constituted by the union of SSU and the site applications needed to collect the information about the towns via Internet (CitySensor Systems-CSS).

-  to let  citizens actively participate to the monitoring on their towns .

 

Citizen participation to town monitoring

The channels today open to the citizen’s participation are represented in Fig.4.

Mostly citizens send complaints to  Local Authorities,  Associations, Newspapers and Services Companies by letters,  fax or e-mail. These means are often affected by some limitations:

-       data collection is rather  occasional and incomplete;

-       citizen messages are stored in archives not open to  citizens, operators or social researchers;

-       proposals and complaints have not the proper format to be automatically processed as a whole so to lead to a global vision of town problems;

-       citizens do not perceive the global process of data collection and processing, and can not monitor the exit or  the responses to the citizens messages that are given by Local Authorities or Services Companies;

-       it is impossible to produce classified information useful to realize Quality Control Observatories.

 

Instead according to a more advanced and democratic view citizens should responsibly:

-       to contribute directly to the information base required for the decision process and the management of the towns;

-       to know the contributions sent by all the others citizens;

-       to participate to the decision process.

CSS are an adequate response to the needs of town monitoring and to the citizen’s right to participate in city government.

The main functionalities to be met in developing such systems are the following:

-       citizen messages (e-mail/forms/images) are collected via Internet;

-       citizen database is fully accessible to citizens and to other actors;

-       messages are automatically classified and processed to produce statistical analysis and a global visioning of city problems;

-       information given by citizens could be used in public services delivering.

 

Using CSS citizens can send their complaints or suggestions (Infocity) by selecting a particular object or urban service (Streets, Bicycle ways, Parks, Street lightening, City cleaning, Waste collection, Gardens, Environment, Pollution, Traffic, Transports, Post Offices, Health, Schools, ect...) ,and filling the relevant forms given by the CSS and so describe drawbacks in the town or inefficiencies of Public Services.

Differently to e-mail, fax, letters and telephone calls, Infocities can be automatically processed. Trough Infocity it  is possible:

-        to locate geographically and temporally the event citizens  intend to send messages (eventually with the help of maps and  street directories);

-        to describe the event by typology and by features using CSS.

CSS can also send the Infocities to the Institutions, to the Authority on the Services Quality, to the relevant Public Services Companies, and allow citizens to monitor the taken interventions, the time employed and the quality of the response.

Although the realization of CSS don’t requests relevant investments, the participation of the citizens is a prerequisite to be assured and so proper promotion  initiatives are required to stimulate and accustom citizens to use it.

 

The benefits of CSS and of participating monitoring

There are  both  techno-economic and social benefits by the use of CSS and by participating urban monitoring.

The techno- economic benefits are connected to the possibility to realize systems allowing:

-       extended diffusion over the territory;

-       high scalability with respect to addition of new  services;

-       low systems and management set-up costs;

-       automatic data-entry.

There are also manifold social benefits.

They are related to the Institutions,  the Services Companies,  the Citizens and  the Associations. They are listed below.

Benefits for the Institutions

-        to have citizens more closed to the city and the institutions;

-        to have efficient and democratic governance tools, based on the active participation of the citizens;

-        to find out shared visions for the city problems;

-        to have maps and up-dated statistics of the drawbacks in the town and so improve the quality of the interventions planned for the city.

Benefits for the Public Services Companies

-        to improve the image of the Public Services Companies in front of the citizens;

-        to cut costs of the call centres and the man power involved in town monitoring;

-        to make focused monitoring and produce lists of priority for the realizations of the interventions.

  Benefits for the Citizens

-        to use tools designed for sending claims and proposals to the Institutions and to the Public Services Companies and monitoring the results of their suggestions;

-        to be a community where the reclaims and communications are positively attended;

-        to feel the city where they live more cohesive and with a higher public behaviour;

-        to be conscious actors of a powerful tool of democratic participation.

 Benefits for the Associations

-       to have access to an extended database regarding the events and the problems of the town, based on the opinions of the Citizens;

-       the growth the level of their initiatives in their representative functions;

-       to profit of a new environment open to democratic participation and involvement of citizens.

 

 Conclusion

 

The technological evolution makes possible to realize CitySensor systems (CSS) usable  for town monitoring purposes. By CSS several objectives of great social relevance can be pursue: reorganization of the public services oriented to the end users, democratic formulation of shared proposals for the towns governance, development of better public behaviours among Citizens and Administrators. CSS can become an essential tool to support the decisions of Institutions and local Authorities in the field of Environmental Control and Public Services Quality.

 

Contacts

Ugo Mocci, ICT expert

Tel.: +39 670 47 50 16, e-mail: umocci@inwind.it

Giovanna Anselmi, ENEA/UDA/ADVISOR

Tel.: +39 636 27 28 01, e-mail: ganselmi@sede.enea.it

 

About the authors

 


Fig. 1. The Environmental and Public Services Quality Systems

 

 

 

 

Fig. 2. To day Town Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 3. Participated Town Management

 

 

 

Fig. 4. Channels for Citizens